. The report
Veltroni (Http://www.corriere.it/politica/08_dicembre_19/direzione_pd_veltroni_f145754c-cdaf-11dd-af32-00144f02aabc.shtml) introduced significant programmatic innovations in the field of economy, welfare, wage agreements, and for a "Law on democracy parties, which include several ideas for which we fought for a year in here.
But it is easy to "open" on the program when you are in opposition. The real theme of the meeting was the Democratic Party, Veltroni, on which a step forward and two steps back. True open primary, democratic functioning of the organs of the party, open to associations and minds of civil society on these points the oligarchs of the party have no intention of open. Even on the moral issue is still prevalent response "case", as if corruption was the daughter of a system and practice of violation of the rules that began in the same PD. As if "a major reformist party" had no role in proposing a comprehensive reform of the mechanisms of power that generate corruption in the public sector.
In this context, there was a small political result: in ten we presented the motion below. And 'perhaps the embryo of an alternative is to "remain in mid-stream" of Veltroni, is to "go back" D'Alema. Too bad that, when voting, I was the only unit to vote "no" to report Veltroni.
MOTION
is a difficult time for the Democratic Party and for his project. His difficulties are summarized in the distance between the intentions of renovation, democracy, participation at the base of the original design and actual construction of the party primaries from 2007 to present. We ask today that the Democratic Party starts from those intentions, offering guarantees to their constituents able to rebuild a relationship strongly compromise the cherished people in the fate of the Left in Italy feel overwhelmed and confused and perceive as increasingly large gap between the trust a year ago and current image of the party: apathetic, ineffective, ruled by selfishness and personal disagreements and power. It is not This is the PD for whom they voted, not what it should and must be. The PD should not be a cap placed on renewal of structures, mechanisms and policies inherited from other parties, other stories, other times. Should not be a more centralized organization and less democratic. It should not be a repetition of patterns and anachronistic losers. If today there is a moral issue in PD, is to do good, democratic, left-wing politics, collecting the consent of the voters with a proposed effective and successful is bad policy to foster corruption, is a good keep it out. For these reasons
We call for a debate on the current government party, currently given to only two bodies (coordination and shadow government) fully appointed by the Secretary, but on the basis of divisions and balances correntizi.
We ask that the Assembly is re-evaluated and used, and that any amendments to the statute, however, are discussed only through the assembly. We
internal democracy, the organization and start-up of intermediate structures and land. We ask, that is, that their statutes and ethical code of PD, often violated or ignored, organs (like this) called without agenda, often unbearable at times, conflicts of interest in children and adults.
We call on the next Election-le-term European commitment to innovation and the construction of a new ruling class to pass through two clear choices and visible
1) Keep your preferences, rejecting any changes to the current electoral law, which restricts the choice of candidates citizens.
2) Avoid selecting candidates excellent young retirement on the basis of skills and capacity to put to the test of European policy.
We ask that the PD remains faithful to the choice of the primaries, who denied the foiled reverse gears in recent weeks, ensuring strength and popular legitimacy to their leaders and candidates. In the name of this locus ask Walter Veltroni, who find in him sharing and guarantee our demands, which are common to many who in recent months have tried in vain to recognize the public image of the PD and its choices in the draft which they believed and still want to believe.
Mario Adinolfi, Giovanni Bachelet, Olga Bertolino, Cristina Comencini, Pier Giorgio Gawronski, Teresa Marzocchi, Nando Dalla Chiesa, Giulio Santagata, Marta Simonini, Luca Sofri
0 comments:
Post a Comment